International Pagan Society: Foundation for Culture, Scholarship & Tradition
Collaboration & Partnership

Working in Partnership: Collaboration with Integrity

The International Pagan Society welcomes thoughtful collaboration with communities, scholars, cultural stewards, artists, creators, educators, institutions, and aligned organizations that respect spiritual diversity, autonomy, consent, and ethical stewardship.

Partnership Principles

Principles That Would Guide Any Collaboration

These are the principles we intend to hold ourselves to as we consider working with other organizations and communities — not the terms of an existing formal agreement.

Mutual Respect

Approaching every prospective collaboration as a relationship between equals, not a transaction of convenience.

Institutional and Community Autonomy

Recognizing that a partner's leadership, governance, and internal decision-making remain fully their own.

Informed Consent and Cultural Care

Seeking clear, informed consent before engaging with a community's practices, knowledge, or cultural material.

Transparency and Accountability

Being honest about what the Society can offer, what it expects, and how a collaboration is going.

Partnership with IPS would never grant the Society control over another organization's beliefs, spiritual practices, leadership, intellectual property, or community governance. Any collaboration is meant to leave a partner's autonomy fully intact.

Prospective Collaboration

Who IPS Hopes to Work With

IPS does not currently have an established network of formal partners. The categories below describe the kinds of communities and organizations we hope to collaborate with in the future — not a list of current partners.

Pagan, Occult, Esoteric & Mystic Communities

Groups and hearths practicing within the many traditions IPS exists to serve.

Educators and Scholars

Teachers and researchers working on religious studies, folklore, and related fields.

Artists, Writers, Creators & Publishers

People making work that documents, interprets, or celebrates these traditions.

Cultural-Preservation Organizations

Groups dedicated to safeguarding cultural knowledge, practices, and heritage.

Libraries, Archives, Museums & Research Institutions

Institutions that steward historical and cultural records and collections.

Community-Service & Public-Benefit Organizations

Nonprofits and civic groups working toward shared public-benefit goals.

Religious-Freedom & Interfaith Organizations

Groups working to protect spiritual freedom and foster interfaith understanding.

Ethical Businesses & Practitioner Networks

Enterprises and practitioner communities operating with transparency and integrity.

Collaboration Opportunities

Possible Future Areas of Collaboration

These are areas where future collaboration might take shape. None of them describe a currently funded, staffed, or operational program.

  • Educational programming
  • Public scholarship
  • Cultural and historical preservation
  • Community outreach
  • Events and conversations
  • Responsible digital preservation
  • Creative and artistic initiatives
  • Ethical livelihood development
  • Religious and spiritual literacy
  • Cross-cultural dialogue
Hypothetical Example — Not an Actual IPS Project

How a Responsible Collaboration Could Work

This is a conceptual illustration of the process we would want a collaboration to follow. It does not describe any project IPS has completed or is currently running.

  1. 1

    Shared Goals Are Identified

    IPS and a prospective partner discuss what each side hopes to accomplish together.

  2. 2

    Authority and Ownership Are Respected

    Cultural authority, intellectual property, and community ownership stay with the community that holds them.

  3. 3

    Consent and Attribution Are Documented

    Expectations around consent, credit, and attribution are written down and agreed to in advance.

  4. 4

    Responsibilities and Resources Are Clarified

    Both sides are clear about who is doing what, and what resources each is contributing.

  5. 5

    Public Communications Are Mutually Approved

    Any public statement about the collaboration is reviewed and approved by both parties beforehand.

  6. 6

    Outcomes Are Reviewed Together

    The partners revisit how the collaboration went and what, if anything, should change going forward.

Reciprocal Partnership Framework

What Each Side Would Bring to the Table

What IPS Seeks to Contribute

  • Mission alignment. A shared commitment to spiritual freedom, cultural respect, and ethical stewardship.
  • Public education and communication. Help sharing accurate, respectful information about a collaboration with the public.
  • Convening and relationship building. A willingness to help connect aligned communities, educators, and organizations.
  • Respectful amplification. Thoughtful promotion of a partner's work, with their consent and on their terms.
  • Collaborative planning. Genuine participation in shaping how a shared project or initiative takes form.
  • Commitment to ethical practice. Adherence to the principles described on this page throughout any collaboration.

What IPS Expects from Partners

  • Respect for spiritual and cultural autonomy. Recognition that IPS does not seek control over a partner's beliefs or governance.
  • Honest representation. Accurate description of who a partner is, what they do, and their relationship to IPS.
  • Informed consent. Clear agreement before any shared use of practices, knowledge, or cultural material.
  • Clear responsibilities. A shared, documented understanding of who is responsible for what.
  • Non-discrimination. Treatment of people and communities without discrimination in any shared work.
  • Appropriate credit and attribution. Fair acknowledgment of everyone's contribution to a collaboration.
  • Transparent financial arrangements. Honesty about any funds, costs, or resources involved in a shared project.
  • Respect for confidentiality and restricted knowledge. Care around knowledge a community considers private, sacred, or restricted.
  • No exploitation, coercion, or deceptive promotion. A shared refusal to pressure, mislead, or take advantage of any party or community.

IPS does not currently provide emergency legal funds, grants, fellowship funding, archival infrastructure, digitization laboratories, international legal representation, or annual funding pools.

Partnership Review Principles

How We Would Think About Evaluating a Collaboration

These are general principles for thinking through whether a collaboration makes sense — not a formal accreditation, certification, or verification process, and not a legal due-diligence determination.

Mission and Values Alignment
Organizational Integrity
Cultural Respect
Community Safety
Financial Clarity for Shared Projects
Conflicts of Interest
Environmental Responsibility
Public Communications and Attribution
Capacity to Fulfill Agreed Responsibilities

We do not promise background checks, legal screening, financial audits, site inspections, or a set review timeline. These principles describe the kinds of questions we would want to ask, not a guaranteed procedure.

Where We Would Draw the Line

Partnerships IPS Would Decline

IPS would not pursue a collaboration that involved any of the following. This describes principles for future decisions, not a record of arrangements that have actually been proposed or rejected.

  • Discrimination or supremacist ideology
  • Spiritual coercion
  • Fraud or deceptive practices
  • Exploitation of vulnerable people
  • Cultural theft or deliberate misrepresentation
  • Environmental destruction
  • Undisclosed conflicts of interest
  • Pressure to compromise IPS's independence or mission
  • Misuse of IPS's name or affiliation
Global Outlook

A Mission Without Borders

The Society's mission is international in scope, and the traditions it hopes to support exist across many countries, cultures, and regions. Any future collaboration is likely to reflect that diversity — different communities, contexts, and local circumstances will shape what a partnership looks like in practice.

We do not publish partner counts, regional totals, or maps of existing alliances, because no such network currently exists. This section describes an outlook, not a record of established international relationships.

Partnership Interest

A verified partnership-interest contact channel has not been established yet. It will be published here once it is available. In the meantime, you can learn more about the Society through ourMission & ValuesandGovernance & Accountabilitypages.

Future Partner Recognition

As verified partnerships are established, they may be published here — but only with the mutual approval of both organizations. We will not display placeholder logos or partner listings that could be mistaken for an existing endorsement.

Building Toward Responsible Collaboration

Help Us Grow into an Organization Worth Partnering With

Your support helps IPS build the kind of accountable, ethical foundation that responsible collaboration depends on.

Donate to the FoundationComing soonGet Involved